My blog is proof that history is fluid and ever-changing. I just read through the whole thing from the beginning and corrected the spelling and punctuation in a half-dozen posts. Their dates and times could have been changed, too. Plus, a new post can be created with any date back to 1999.
It usually takes me an hour to write a long post or about 20 minutes for a Song of the Day so the time that you see on the post is wrong anyway. My typical post is edited at least twice after reading it again and again.
Good thing this isn't a respected news source. Of course, that's why I added a number of disclaimers to the site today. They should cover just about anything short of my own stupidity. That's a hurdle too high for anything short of divine intervention.
BTW - This comment was added during the 1st edit on this post.
Yup --- two edits. I'm going away now and leave this post in peace. Or pieces. Visualize Whirled Peas!
Post last edited 08/31/04 07:31 pm eastern when I changed That's too high of a hurdle for anything short of divine intervention to That's a hurdle too high for anything short of divine intervention because the new brevity is more nearly correct grammatically and it sounds better. Seeing isn't always believing, I guess, and time is mutable. Now it's up to you to figure out how many times I edited this addendum and what was changed ... or not!